Clean Code - Critical Analysis

Clean code is probably the most recommended book to entry level engineers and junior developers. While it might have been good recommendation in the past, I don't believe that's the case anymore.

After revisiting the book in 2023 I was surprised to notice that:

  • The book hasn't aged well
  • Much of its advice ranges from questionable to harmful
  • Examples are the worst part of the book. By any objective metrics, many would qualify as "bad code."
  • Lazer focus on a wrong thing and attempt to sell it as the solution to everything. Code readability is important, it is not the only one aspect
  • Despite being an entry-level book, it has these vibes of implied superiority, potentially giving the readers an undeserved sense of expertise

For a significantly shorter critque of the book, check out qntm's critique. I mostly agree with qntm assessment. But it's a bit too emotional and personal and doesn't cover the parts i find the most harmful.

If you're just starting your career and seeking books to improve your coding skills, I suggest these instead:

Also Robert Martin is working on the second edition of Clean Code. It will be fun to see how much of this critique will become irrelevant 😃

Intended Audience

  • For those recommending "Clean Code":
    You may have read the book over a decade ago and found it useful at the time. This might help you reconsider.
  • For those confused after reading "Clean Code":
    You’re not alone. The book can be confusing, and you might find better practical advice in modern alternatives
  • For those who enjoyed "Clean Code":
    "It's great when people get excited about things, but sometimes they get a little too excited."
    I hope this critique would help you to see more nuance.

A Note to All Readers

This page exists as a reference for anyone. Agree or disagree, contributions to the critique are welcome via GitHub.